BBH Chapter 15 — Qal Imperfect Strong Verbs


Files

Reference Files

File Description
qal-imperfect-paradigm.md Full PGN paradigm: A/B/C vowel classes, jussive forms, with key-marker notes

Exercises

Exercise Description
exercises/ch15-parsing-drill/ 25 pointed forms — identify prefix, PGN, and root for each Qal Imperfect
exercises/ch15-passage-exercise/ 15 Qal Imperfect verbs from the burning bush narrative to parse (PGN + root) and identify usage type
exercises/ch15-qal-imperfect-paradigm-drill/ Paradigm drill — write all 10 Qal Imperfect forms of שמר from memory

Flashcards

File Format Description
ch15-morphology-deck.md Markdown 25-card morphology deck — Qal Imperfect Strong forms across all 14 PGN cells
ch15-morphology-deck.txt Anki import Morphology deck — tab-separated, ready for Anki File → Import (25 cards)
ch15-morphology-deck-fd.txt Flashcards Deluxe Morphology deck — tab-separated, ready for Flashcards Deluxe import (25 cards)
ch15-vocab-deck.md Markdown Vocabulary deck — 16 words (6 verbs, 6 nouns, 4 other) with POS tags and frequency
ch15-vocab-deck.txt Anki import Vocabulary deck — tab-separated, ready for Anki File → Import (16 cards)
ch15-vocab-deck-fd.txt Flashcards Deluxe Vocabulary deck — tab-separated, ready for Flashcards Deluxe import (16 cards)

Notebooks

Notebook What it shows
Qal Stem Qal stem: conjugation profile showing Imperfect (yiqtol) distribution

Basics of Biblical Hebrew, Pratico & Van Pelt
Data: MACULA Hebrew WLC (~9,156 Qal Imperfect tokens OT-wide)

Context: The Qal Imperfect (yiqtol) accounts for 18.2% of all Qal verb tokens.
When the sequential Wayyiqtol (22.9%) — which is built on the Imperfect — is included,
Imperfect-derived forms account for over 41% of all Qal usage.


1. Function (BBH §15.2)

The Qal Imperfect expresses an action or state viewed as incomplete, ongoing, or not yet
fully realized
. Unlike English tense markers, Hebrew aspect is context-driven; the
same Imperfect form can express future, habitual, or modal nuance.

Use Description Example
Simple Future An action expected to happen יִמְלֹךְ — "he will reign"
Habitual/Repeated An action that recurs or is customary יִקְרְאוּ — "they used to call / they call"
Jussive A wish or mild command (3rd person) יְהִי אֹור — "Let there be light" (Gen 1:3)
Cohortative A volitional declaration (1st person) אֶשְׁמְרָה — "Let me keep / I will keep"
Modal / Conditional Possibility, necessity, or conditionality לֹא תִּגְנֹב — "You shall not steal"
Negated with לֹא Prohibition of a future act לֹא תִּרְצָח — "You shall not murder"
Negated with אַל Prohibition of an immediate act אַל תִּירָא — "Do not fear!"

Key diagnostic: The Imperfect always has a prefix letter (יִ/תִּ/אֶ/נִ) before the
root. This is the single most reliable feature. The Perfect has no prefix.
The Wayyiqtol (Ch17) is a special sequential Imperfect — same prefix, with וַ- plus
dagesh forte in the prefix consonant.


2. Form: Diagnostic Markers (BBH §15.3–15.5)

→ Full paradigm: qal-imperfect-paradigm.md


3. Paradigm Summary

Strong root model: קָטַל / יִקְטֹל (A-class, holem).

Person Form Prefix Notes
3ms יִקְטֹל יִ No ending
3fs תִּקְטֹל תִּ Same prefix as 2ms
2ms תִּקְטֹל תִּ Same form as 3fs — context distinguishes
2fs תִּקְטְלִי תִּ Hireq-yod suffix
1cs אֶקְטֹל אֶ Patach under prefix (not hireq)
3mp יִקְטְלוּ יִ Shureq suffix
3fp תִּקְטֹלְנָה תִּ Nah-ending
2mp תִּקְטְלוּ תִּ Shureq suffix
2fp תִּקְטֹלְנָה תִּ Nah-ending; same as 3fp
1cp נִקְטֹל נִ Nun prefix

3ms = 3fs ambiguity — both are תִּקְטֹל. This is resolved by context: the grammatical
subject of the clause will indicate whether the actor is masculine or feminine.

→ Full paradigm with A/B/C vowel classes: qal-imperfect-paradigm.md


4. A-Class, B-Class, and Stative Imperfects (BBH §15.6)

Type Theme vowel under R2 3ms example Common roots
A-class (holem) holem (ō) יִקְטֹל Most action verbs: שמר, כתב, למד
B-class (patach) patach (a) יִשְׁמַע Some transitive verbs: שמע, ידע
B-class (tsere) tsere (ē) יִשְׁכַּב A few verbs; less predictable

The theme vowel of the Imperfect is not fully predictable from the Perfect. A verb may
have qamets in the Perfect and holem in the Imperfect (type A/A), or qamets in the Perfect
and patach in the Imperfect (type A/B). The lexicon entry gives both.


5. Stative vs. Fientive in the Imperfect (BBH §15.7)

Stative roots that had type-B (tsere) or type-C (holem) in the Perfect often take
patach in the Imperfect under R2:

Root Perfect 3ms Imperfect 3ms Meaning
כָּבֵד כָּבֵד יִכְבַּד to be heavy/honored
גָּדֵל גָּדֵל יִגְדַּל to be great
קָטֹן קָטֹן יִקְטַן to be small
יָרֵא יָרֵא יִירָא to fear/revere

6. Most Common Lemmas — Torah Qal Imperfect (BBH §15.8)

Source: MACULA Hebrew WLC, Genesis–Deuteronomy, Qal Imperfect (yiqtol) tokens.

Lemma Hebrew Torah (×) Gloss Class Notes
הָיָה הָיָה 358 be, become III-ה Dominant existential verb
עָשָׂה עָשָׂה 228 do, make III-ה
אָכַל אָכַל 143 eat I-gutt.
נָתַן נָתַן 125 give I-נ Nun assimilates in imperfect
בּוֹא בּוֹא 89 come, go in Biconsonantal
לָקַח לָקַח 73 take I-gutt.
שָׁמַע שָׁמַע 54 hear III-gutt.
מוּת מוּת 53 die Biconsonantal
הָלַך הָלַך 52 walk, go I-gutt.
אָמַר אָמַר 43 say I-gutt.
נָשָׂא נָשָׂא 43 lift, carry I-נ / III-א
רָאָה רָאָה 42 see III-ה
יָכֹל יָכֹל 42 be able Stative-C
יָצָא יָצָא 35 go out I-י
שָׁמַר שָׁמַר 31 keep, guard III-gutt.

Note on I-נ in the Imperfect: נָתַן becomes יִתֵּן (not יִנְתֵּן) — the nun assimilates
into the tav by dagesh forte. This is the key I-נ pattern in the Imperfect. Chapter 16
covers all weak classes in the Imperfect in detail.


7. Example Passages


Simple Future

Gen 2:17 — כִּ֗י בְּיֹ֛ום אֲכָלְךָ֥ מִמֶּ֖נּוּ מֹ֥ות תָּמֽוּת
"For on the day you eat of it, you will surely die."
→ מוּת: root מות, Qal Imperfect 2ms. Biconsonantal weak; preceded by inf. absolute for emphasis.

Gen 3:5 — וִֽהְיִיתֶ֖ם כֵּֽאלֹהִ֑ים יֹדְעֵ֖י טֹ֥וב וָרָֽע
"and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
→ (participial clause in this verse; Imperfect is in the surrounding context)

Exo 3:12 — כִּֽי אֶֽהְיֶ֣ה עִמָּ֔ך
"For I will be with you."
→ הָיָה: Qal Imperfect 1cs. God's promise to Moses; simple future.


Habitual/Repeated

Gen 2:10 — וְנָהָר֙ יֹצֵ֣א מֵעֵ֔דֶן לְהַשְׁקֹ֖ות אֶת־הַגָּ֑ן
"A river continually went out from Eden to water the garden."
→ יָצָא: Qal Imperfect 3ms (I-י weak). Habitual/repeated past action — the river flowed
continuously.

Exo 13:21 — יְהוָ֡ה הֹלֵ֣ךְ לִפְנֵיהֶם֩ יֹומָ֨ם בְּעַמּ֤וּד עָנָן֙
"The LORD was going before them by day in a pillar of cloud."
→ הֹלֵךְ: Qal Participle 3ms (habitual/ongoing; the Participle competes with the Imperfect
for habitual meaning). Included for comparison.


Jussive (3rd Person Wish/Command)

Gen 1:3 — וַיֹּ֥אמֶר אֱלֹהִ֖ים יְהִ֣י אֹ֑ור
"And God said: 'Let there be light.'"
→ הָיָה: Qal Jussive 3ms (III-ה weak; short jussive = יְהִי without final ה).
Classic jussive — God speaks a third-person volitional command into existence.

Gen 1:6 — יְהִ֣י רָקִ֔יעַ בְּת֖וֹךְ הַמָּ֑יִם
"Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters."
→ הָיָה: Jussive 3ms again; demonstrates the standard creation formula.


Cohortative (1st Person Volitional)

Gen 1:26 — נַֽעֲשֶׂ֥ה אָדָ֛ם בְּצַלְמֵ֖נוּ
"Let us make man in our image."
→ עָשָׂה: Qal Cohortative 1cp (III-ה; the נַ- prefix + ה-ending marks cohortative).
The cohortative expresses the divine resolve.

Gen 37:17 — נֵלְכָ֣ה דֹתָ֑יְנָה
"Let us go to Dothan."
→ הָלַך: Qal Cohortative 1cp. A volitional statement ("Let us go").


Modal / Prohibition (לֹא + Imperfect)

Exo 20:13 — לֹ֖א תִּרְצָֽח
"You shall not murder."
→ רָצַח: Qal Imperfect 2ms. The Ten Commandments use לֹא + Imperfect for absolute
prohibition — a categorical, ongoing prohibition, not a one-time command.

Exo 20:14 — לֹ֣א תִנְאָ֑ף
"You shall not commit adultery."
→ נָאַף: Qal Imperfect 2ms. Same pattern.


Negation with אַל (Immediate Prohibition)

Gen 21:17 — אַל־תִּ֣ירְאִ֔י
"Do not fear!"
→ יָרֵא: Qal Imperfect 2fs with אַל. Immediate command to Hagar not to be afraid —
אַל + Imperfect (or Jussive) is more urgent than לֹא + Imperfect.

Gen 22:12 — אַל תִּשְׁלַ֤ח יָדְךָ֙ אֶל הַנַּ֔עַר
"Do not lay your hand on the boy."
→ שָׁלַח: Qal Imperfect 2ms with אַל. The angel stops Abraham at the moment of action.


8. Conjugation Distribution — OT-wide Qal

Conjugation Count % of all Qal
Wayyiqtol 11,505 22.9%
Perfect (qatal) 10,097 20.1%
Imperfect (yiqtol) 9,156 18.2%
Participle (active) 5,532 11.0%
Infinitive Construct 4,525 9.0%
Weqatal 3,828 7.6%
Imperative 2,882 5.7%
Participle (passive) 987 2.0%
Jussive 787 1.6%
Infinitive Absolute 510 1.0%
Cohortative 370 0.7%

Total OT Qal tokens: ~50,179 across 39 books.

The Imperfect's 18.2% share increases substantially when the Wayyiqtol (an Imperfect-based
form) is counted: together they are over 41% of all Qal usage. The Imperfect is also the
base form for the Jussive (1.6%) and Cohortative (0.7%), bringing the total Imperfect family
to roughly 43%.


9. Practice

Resource Description
Morphology Flashcard Deck Qal Imperfect forms across all 14 PGN cells for 3 high-frequency roots.
Passage Exercise — Exodus 3–4 15 Qal Imperfect verbs from the burning bush narrative to parse (PGN + root) and identify usage type.
Parsing Drill 25 pointed forms — identify prefix, PGN, and root for each Qal Imperfect.

10. Links

Resource URL
Anki (free flashcard app — Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) apps.ankiweb.net
Morphology import file for this chapter ch15-morphology-deck.txt